Curated top 10 rankings of everything
HOME/RED HAT OPENSHIFT/ALTERNATIVES

Red Hat OpenShift alternatives

10 companies ranked alongside Red Hat OpenShift on Lister's rankings, compared on what each is best for, its starting price and its Lister Score.

FROM 2 RANKINGS · UPDATED
The closest alternatives to Red Hat OpenShift on Lister are Rancher, Google Kubernetes Engine and Azure Kubernetes Service, the companies that share the most rankings with it. Each is compared below on its stated best fit, starting price and Lister Score.
Red Hat OpenShift alternatives, compared
#ALTERNATIVEBEST FORSCOREFROMRANKED
1RancherMulti-cluster enterprise management95.0Free#1 in Top 10 Kubernetes ManagementOn 2 of Red Hat OpenShift's rankings
2Google Kubernetes EngineGoogle Cloud native users92.7Pay as you go#2 in Top 10 Container ManagementOn 2 of Red Hat OpenShift's rankings
3Azure Kubernetes ServiceMicrosoft-centric enterprises90.3Free control plane#3 in Top 10 Container ManagementOn 2 of Red Hat OpenShift's rankings
4Mirantis Kubernetes EngineHybrid cloud environments with legacy workloads83.3Custom#6 in Top 10 Container ManagementOn 2 of Red Hat OpenShift's rankings
5DigitalOcean KubernetesDevelopers and small businesses81.010 dollars per month#7 in Top 10 Kubernetes ManagementOn 2 of Red Hat OpenShift's rankings
6Linode Kubernetes EngineCost-conscious developers76.310 dollars per month#9 in Top 10 Kubernetes ManagementOn 2 of Red Hat OpenShift's rankings
7Amazon Elastic Container ServiceScalable container management for AWSAWS-centric teams95.0$0 per hour#1 in Top 10 Container Management
8Amazon Elastic Kubernetes ServiceAWS-centric infrastructure88.0Pay as you go#4 in Top 10 Kubernetes Management
9NomadSimple and flexible workload orchestratorLightweight multi-workload scheduling81.0$0 per hour#7 in Top 10 Container Management
10Docker SwarmNative clustering for DockerSimple container clustering78.7$0 per hour#8 in Top 10 Container Management
FROM LISTER RANKINGS · UPDATED HOW WE RANK →

How to choose an alternative to Red Hat OpenShift

Start from what you need it for. Where each fits best, as Lister records it:

Closest to Red Hat OpenShift by the rankings they share: Rancher (2 rankings), Google Kubernetes Engine (2 rankings) and Azure Kubernetes Service (2 rankings).

Free to start, by their stated pricing: Rancher, Azure Kubernetes Service, Amazon Elastic Container Service, Nomad and Docker Swarm.

Custom or quote-based pricing: Mirantis Kubernetes Engine.

Each Lister Score is the alternative's score on the ranking named in its row, so compare scores within one ranking rather than across rankings. How the score is made.

Each alternative in brief

01

Rancher

#1 in Top 10 Kubernetes Management: An enterprise-grade open source container management platform designed for multi-cluster Kubernetes operations.

FreeBest for: Multi-cluster enterprise managementFull profile
PROS
  • Excellent multi-cluster management
  • Strong enterprise security controls
CONS
  • Steep learning curve for beginners
95.0
02

Google Kubernetes Engine

#2 in Top 10 Container Management: A managed environment for deploying, managing, and scaling containerized applications using Google infrastructure.

Pricing: Pay as you goBest for: Google Cloud native usersFull profile
PROS
  • Automated scaling and updates
  • Deep integration with Google Cloud services
CONS
  • Potential vendor lock-in
92.7
03

Azure Kubernetes Service

#3 in Top 10 Container Management: A managed Kubernetes service that makes it simple to deploy, manage, and scale containerized applications in Azure.

Free control planeBest for: Microsoft-centric enterprisesFull profile
PROS
  • Free control plane
  • Strong integration with Azure DevOps and Active Directory
CONS
  • Windows container support can be complex
90.3
04

Mirantis Kubernetes Engine

#6 in Top 10 Container Management: An enterprise container platform that allows teams to build, run, and scale applications securely on any infrastructure.

Pricing: CustomBest for: Hybrid cloud environments with legacy workloadsFull profile
PROS
  • Supports both Kubernetes and Docker Swarm
  • Strong focus on container security
CONS
  • Smaller community compared to major cloud providers
83.3
05

DigitalOcean Kubernetes

#7 in Top 10 Kubernetes Management: A managed Kubernetes service that reduces the complexity of deploying and scaling containerised apps.

Pricing: 10 dollars per monthBest for: Developers and small businessesFull profile
PROS
  • Straightforward and predictable pricing
  • User-friendly control panel
CONS
  • Fewer advanced enterprise features than AWS or Azure
81.0
06

Linode Kubernetes Engine

#9 in Top 10 Kubernetes Management: An Akamai-owned managed container orchestration service for deploying cloud-native applications.

Pricing: 10 dollars per monthBest for: Cost-conscious developersFull profile
PROS
  • No control plane charges
  • Predictable and low-cost bandwidth
CONS
  • Limited global data centre regions compared to hyperscalers
76.3
07

Amazon Elastic Container Service

Scalable container management for AWS

#1 in Top 10 Container Management: A fully managed container orchestration service that supports Docker containers and allows you to easily run applications on a managed cluster of Amazon EC2 instances.

$0 per hourBest for: AWS-centric teamsFull profile
PROS
  • Deep integration with the broader AWS ecosystem
  • Lower operational complexity compared to running raw Kubernetes
CONS
  • Vendor lock-in to Amazon Web Services
95.0
08

Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service

#4 in Top 10 Kubernetes Management: A managed service that makes it easy to run Kubernetes on AWS without needing to install your own control plane.

Pricing: Pay as you goBest for: AWS-centric infrastructureFull profile
PROS
  • Robust integration with AWS security and networking
  • Highly reliable and scalable
CONS
  • Complex pricing structure
88.0
09

Nomad

Simple and flexible workload orchestrator

#7 in Top 10 Container Management: An easy-to-use, flexible, and performant workload orchestrator that can manage a mix of container and non-container applications.

$0 per hourBest for: Lightweight multi-workload schedulingFull profile
PROS
  • Extremely lightweight with minimal resource overhead
  • Handles non-container workloads alongside containers
CONS
  • Smaller ecosystem of pre-built integrations than Kubernetes
  • Fewer native enterprise features in the open-source edition
81.0
10

Docker Swarm

Native clustering for Docker

#8 in Top 10 Container Management: Native clustering and orchestration tool for Docker containers that turns a pool of Docker hosts into a single virtual host.

$0 per hourBest for: Simple container clusteringFull profile
PROS
  • Very fast and straightforward to set up
  • Minimal learning curve for developers already using Docker
CONS
  • Lacks the advanced scheduling and scaling features of Kubernetes
  • Smaller active community for enterprise support
78.7