The closest alternatives to Tricentis Tosca on Lister are Applitools, Katalon and Mabl, the companies that share the most rankings with it. Each is compared below on its stated best fit, starting price and Lister Score.
How to choose an alternative to Tricentis Tosca
Start from what you need it for. Where each fits best, as Lister records it:
Closest to Tricentis Tosca by the rankings they share: Applitools (2 rankings), Katalon (2 rankings) and Mabl (2 rankings).
Stated starting prices: Katalon ($205/month), Testim ($450/month), ReQtest ($10/user/month) and Testsigma ($349/month).
Custom or quote-based pricing: Applitools, Mabl, Functionize, Parasoft, AccelQ and Perforce Helix Core.
Each Lister Score is the alternative's score on the ranking named in its row, so compare scores within one ranking rather than across rankings. How the score is made.
Each alternative in brief
01
#1 in Enterprise test automation tools: Applitools is a Visual AI platform that ensures software interfaces render correctly across browsers and devices. It provides deterministic validation to eliminate false positives and guarantee release safety.
PROS- Unmatched visual regression accuracy
- Integrates with virtually any testing framework
CONS- Pricing can be prohibitive for startups
98.0
02
#2 in Enterprise test automation tools: Katalon is an end-to-end AI testing platform for QA teams. It offers test automation, management, execution and production insights.
PROS- Supports multiple platforms and environments
- Active community and extensive plugins
CONS- Performance can slow down on massive test suites
98.0
03
#3 in Top 10 AI Test-Case Generators: An intelligent test automation platform built for modern development teams, integrating seamlessly into the CI/CD pipeline.
PROS- Comprehensive performance and visual testing
- Easy collaboration for non-technical users
CONS- Limited customisation for complex scripts
90.3
04
#4 in Enterprise test automation tools: Functionize is an independent testing agent for full web UI workflows. It is built to prove quality through agentic automation.
PROS- Tests written in plain English
- Strong cloud-based test execution grid
CONS- Requires reliable internet connection for cloud features
94.0
05
#8 in Top 10 AI Test-Case Generators: Parasoft provides automated software testing solutions with a strong emphasis on compliance, security, and AI-driven unit testing.
PROS- Excellent code coverage analytics
- Strong focus on safety-critical compliance
CONS- User interface feels dated compared to modern cloud tools
78.7
06
#1 in Top 10 AI Test-Case Generators: Testim uses machine learning to accelerate the authoring, execution, and maintenance of automated tests, reducing flaky tests significantly.
PROS- Fast test authoring using AI
- Self-healing tests reduce maintenance
CONS- Higher cost for smaller teams
95.0
07
#6 in Top 10 AI Test-Case Generators: A cloud-native continuous testing platform that uses AI to automate API and web testing without writing code.
PROS- Zero-code design philosophy
- Out-of-the-box process traceability
CONS- Documentation can be sparse in advanced areas
83.3
08
#7 in Enterprise test automation tools: Perforce Helix Core provides a scalable version control foundation for global teams. It handles the expanding size and complexity of modern projects without limits.
PROS- Unmatched performance with large binary files
- Robust locking mechanisms for exclusive file editing
CONS- Expensive enterprise licensing model
- Not optimized for standard open-source Git workflows
86.0
09
#9 in Top 10 AI Test-Case Generators: A cloud-based test management and requirement tool that helps teams trace bugs and structure test cases efficiently.
PROS- Affordable pricing model
- Intuitive requirements traceability
CONS- Less advanced AI capabilities than pure automation tools
76.3
10
#10 in Top 10 AI Test-Case Generators: An AI-driven test automation platform that allows teams to author tests using natural language across web, mobile, and APIs.
PROS- Fast setup with cloud infrastructure
- Collaborative environment for cross-functional teams
CONS- Cloud execution limits on lower tiers
74.0